Best Known (16, 53, s)-Nets in Base 3
(16, 53, 28)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 53, 28)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (15, 53, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
(16, 53, 55)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (16, 53, 56)-net over F3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (16, 52, 56)-net over F3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(352, 56, F3, 36) (dual of [56, 4, 37]-code), but
(16, 53, 57)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 53, 58)-net in base 3, because
- 2 times m-reduction [i] would yield (16, 51, 58)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(351, 58, S3, 35), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2151 540269 112482 208544 436253 / 946 > 351 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(351, 58, S3, 35), but