Best Known (20, 60, s)-Nets in Base 3
(20, 60, 28)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 60, 28)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (15, 60, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
(20, 60, 32)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (20, 60, 32)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 60, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 31)-sequence over F3, using
(20, 60, 70)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (20, 60, 71)-net over F3, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(360, 71, F3, 40) (dual of [71, 11, 41]-code), but
- “Gur†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
(20, 60, 72)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 60, 73)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 59, 73)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(359, 73, S3, 39), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 575447 637759 001874 791324 271023 513509 / 37 398920 > 359 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(359, 73, S3, 39), but