Best Known (75, 84, s)-Nets in Base 3
(75, 84, 1195741)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (75, 84, 1195741)-net over F3, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(384, 1195741, F3, 9, 9) (dual of [(1195741, 9), 10761585, 10]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 4-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(384, 4782965, F3, 9) (dual of [4782965, 4782881, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(384, 4782968, F3, 9) (dual of [4782968, 4782884, 10]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(385, 4782969, F3, 10) (dual of [4782969, 4782884, 11]-code), using
- an extension Ce(9) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4782968 = 314−1, defining interval I = [1,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(385, 4782969, F3, 10) (dual of [4782969, 4782884, 11]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(384, 4782968, F3, 9) (dual of [4782968, 4782884, 10]-code), using
- OOA 4-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(384, 4782965, F3, 9) (dual of [4782965, 4782881, 10]-code), using
(75, 84, 2391484)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (75, 84, 2391484)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(384, 2391484, F3, 2, 9) (dual of [(2391484, 2), 4782884, 10]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(384, 4782968, F3, 9) (dual of [4782968, 4782884, 10]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(385, 4782969, F3, 10) (dual of [4782969, 4782884, 11]-code), using
- an extension Ce(9) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4782968 = 314−1, defining interval I = [1,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(385, 4782969, F3, 10) (dual of [4782969, 4782884, 11]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(384, 4782968, F3, 9) (dual of [4782968, 4782884, 10]-code), using
(75, 84, large)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (75, 84, large)-net in base 3, because
- 7 times m-reduction [i] would yield (75, 77, large)-net in base 3, but