Best Known (36, 36+10, s)-Nets in Base 32
(36, 36+10, 1677720)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 46, 1677720)-net over F32, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(3246, 1677720, F32, 10, 10) (dual of [(1677720, 10), 16777154, 11]-NRT-code), using
- OA 5-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(3246, 8388600, F32, 10) (dual of [8388600, 8388554, 11]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3246, large, F32, 10) (dual of [large, large−46, 11]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 33554431 = 325−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3246, large, F32, 10) (dual of [large, large−46, 11]-code), using
- OA 5-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(3246, 8388600, F32, 10) (dual of [8388600, 8388554, 11]-code), using
(36, 36+10, large)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (36, 46, large)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3246, large, F32, 10) (dual of [large, large−46, 11]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 33554431 = 325−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
(36, 36+10, large)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 46, large)-net in base 32, because
- 8 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 38, large)-net in base 32, but