Best Known (48, 48+13, s)-Nets in Base 32
(48, 48+13, 1398100)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 61, 1398100)-net over F32, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(3261, 1398100, F32, 13, 13) (dual of [(1398100, 13), 18175239, 14]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 6-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(3261, 8388601, F32, 13) (dual of [8388601, 8388540, 14]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3261, large, F32, 13) (dual of [large, large−61, 14]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 33554433 | 3210−1, defining interval I = [0,6], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−6,−5,…,6}|+1 = 14 (BCH-bound) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3261, large, F32, 13) (dual of [large, large−61, 14]-code), using
- OOA 6-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(3261, 8388601, F32, 13) (dual of [8388601, 8388540, 14]-code), using
(48, 48+13, large)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (48, 61, large)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3261, large, F32, 13) (dual of [large, large−61, 14]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 33554433 | 3210−1, defining interval I = [0,6], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−6,−5,…,6}|+1 = 14 (BCH-bound) [i]
(48, 48+13, large)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 61, large)-net in base 32, because
- 11 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 50, large)-net in base 32, but