Best Known (10, 10+21, s)-Nets in Base 32
(10, 10+21, 104)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (10, 31, 104)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (9, 31, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
(10, 10+21, 113)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (10, 31, 113)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 112)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 113, using
(10, 10+21, 129)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(10, 31, 129)-net in base 32, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 35, 129)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 25, 129)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- the rational function field F128(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 25, 129)-net over F128, using
(10, 10+21, 4782)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (10, 31, 4783)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (10, 30, 4783)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 1429 661844 817339 481479 857839 922254 309034 188293 > 3230 [i]