Best Known (6, 6+23, s)-Nets in Base 32
(6, 6+23, 76)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (6, 29, 76)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (5, 29, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
(6, 6+23, 80)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(6, 29, 80)-net in base 32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (6, 30, 80)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 25, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 25, 80)-net over F64, using
(6, 6+23, 86)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (6, 29, 86)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 85)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 86, using
(6, 6+23, 1068)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (6, 29, 1069)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (6, 28, 1069)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 1 400941 006923 254575 394233 582702 291341 901380 > 3228 [i]