Best Known (9, 9+26, s)-Nets in Base 32
(9, 9+26, 104)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 35, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
(9, 9+26, 108)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (9, 35, 108)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 107)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 108, using
(9, 9+26, 113)-Net in Base 32
(9, 35, 113)-net in base 32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (9, 36, 113)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 30, 113)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 112)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 113, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 112)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 30, 113)-net over F64, using
(9, 9+26, 2055)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 35, 2056)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 47897 148074 148440 780650 792617 327665 663570 068576 122624 > 3235 [i]