Best Known (77−31, 77, s)-Nets in Base 32
(77−31, 77, 294)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 77, 294)-net over F32, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 17, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (7, 22, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (7, 38, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (7, 17, 98)-net over F32, using
(77−31, 77, 515)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(46, 77, 515)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on (24, 55, 515)-net in base 128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (24, 56, 515)-net in base 128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (17, 49, 515)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 16, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (0, 16, 257)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- base change [i] based on digital (17, 49, 515)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (24, 56, 515)-net in base 128, using
(77−31, 77, 2851)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (46, 77, 2851)-net over F32, using
(77−31, 77, large)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 77, large)-net in base 32, because
- 29 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 48, large)-net in base 32, but