Best Known (82−39, 82, s)-Nets in Base 32
(82−39, 82, 240)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 82, 240)-net over F32, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (43, 85, 240)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 32, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 53, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (11, 32, 120)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(82−39, 82, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(43, 82, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 90, 513)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 75, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 75, 513)-net over F64, using
(82−39, 82, 915)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (43, 82, 915)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3282, 915, F32, 39) (dual of [915, 833, 40]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3282, 1042, F32, 39) (dual of [1042, 960, 40]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,19]) ⊂ C([0,16]) [i] based on
- linear OA(3277, 1025, F32, 39) (dual of [1025, 948, 40]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1025 | 324−1, defining interval I = [0,19], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−19,−18,…,19}|+1 = 40 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(3265, 1025, F32, 33) (dual of [1025, 960, 34]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1025 | 324−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−16,−15,…,16}|+1 = 34 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(325, 17, F32, 5) (dual of [17, 12, 6]-code or 17-arc in PG(4,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(325, 32, F32, 5) (dual of [32, 27, 6]-code or 32-arc in PG(4,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(27,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(325, 32, F32, 5) (dual of [32, 27, 6]-code or 32-arc in PG(4,32)), using
- construction X applied to C([0,19]) ⊂ C([0,16]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3282, 1042, F32, 39) (dual of [1042, 960, 40]-code), using
(82−39, 82, 667635)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 82, 667636)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 81, 667636)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 82 632625 837239 432258 581291 264762 371746 509192 708709 305127 740235 623254 405470 331401 426705 996440 827787 495958 828840 374243 931533 > 3281 [i]