Best Known (18, 18+45, s)-Nets in Base 32
(18, 18+45, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (18, 63, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 63, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(18, 18+45, 161)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (18, 63, 161)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 160)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 161, using
(18, 18+45, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(18, 63, 177)-net in base 32, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 66, 177)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 55, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 55, 177)-net over F64, using
(18, 18+45, 5085)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (18, 63, 5086)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (18, 62, 5086)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2091 680866 928091 856918 092160 443597 179051 864558 713318 519197 714264 187602 062308 094406 051954 817436 > 3262 [i]