Best Known (48, 48+45, s)-Nets in Base 32
(48, 48+45, 240)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 93, 240)-net over F32, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (48, 100, 240)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 37, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 63, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (11, 37, 120)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(48, 48+45, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(48, 93, 513)-net in base 32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (46, 93, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 15 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- 15 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
(48, 48+45, 885)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (48, 93, 885)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3293, 885, F32, 45) (dual of [885, 792, 46]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3293, 1047, F32, 45) (dual of [1047, 954, 46]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(44) ⊂ Ce(36) [i] based on
- linear OA(3286, 1024, F32, 45) (dual of [1024, 938, 46]-code), using an extension Ce(44) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,44], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 45 [i]
- linear OA(3270, 1024, F32, 37) (dual of [1024, 954, 38]-code), using an extension Ce(36) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,36], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 37 [i]
- linear OA(327, 23, F32, 7) (dual of [23, 16, 8]-code or 23-arc in PG(6,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(327, 32, F32, 7) (dual of [32, 25, 8]-code or 32-arc in PG(6,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(25,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(327, 32, F32, 7) (dual of [32, 25, 8]-code or 32-arc in PG(6,32)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(44) ⊂ Ce(36) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3293, 1047, F32, 45) (dual of [1047, 954, 46]-code), using
(48, 48+45, 575104)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 93, 575105)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 92, 575105)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 977241 441482 558094 820392 482258 212708 588178 765857 202265 509356 577570 494147 920921 849896 934035 299690 321935 382162 275651 143927 912879 831854 098496 > 3292 [i]