Best Known (47, 47+46, s)-Nets in Base 32
(47, 47+46, 240)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 93, 240)-net over F32, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (47, 97, 240)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 36, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 61, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (11, 36, 120)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(47, 47+46, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(47, 93, 513)-net in base 32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (46, 93, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 15 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- 15 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
(47, 47+46, 761)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (47, 93, 761)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3293, 761, F32, 46) (dual of [761, 668, 47]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3293, 1041, F32, 46) (dual of [1041, 948, 47]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(45) ⊂ Ce(39) [i] based on
- linear OA(3288, 1024, F32, 46) (dual of [1024, 936, 47]-code), using an extension Ce(45) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,45], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 46 [i]
- linear OA(3276, 1024, F32, 40) (dual of [1024, 948, 41]-code), using an extension Ce(39) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,39], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 40 [i]
- linear OA(325, 17, F32, 5) (dual of [17, 12, 6]-code or 17-arc in PG(4,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(325, 32, F32, 5) (dual of [32, 27, 6]-code or 32-arc in PG(4,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(27,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(325, 32, F32, 5) (dual of [32, 27, 6]-code or 32-arc in PG(4,32)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(45) ⊂ Ce(39) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3293, 1041, F32, 46) (dual of [1041, 948, 47]-code), using
(47, 47+46, 370784)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 93, 370785)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 95 268745 363088 206191 107453 150916 909959 792111 217413 189271 721136 924898 223405 414350 893519 395010 180280 812808 735267 640706 051228 781657 934572 886688 > 3293 [i]