Best Known (51, 51+48, s)-Nets in Base 32
(51, 51+48, 240)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 99, 240)-net over F32, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 109, 240)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 40, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 69, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (11, 40, 120)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(51, 51+48, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(51, 99, 513)-net in base 32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (46, 99, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
(51, 51+48, 913)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (51, 99, 913)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3299, 913, F32, 48) (dual of [913, 814, 49]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3299, 1047, F32, 48) (dual of [1047, 948, 49]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(47) ⊂ Ce(39) [i] based on
- linear OA(3292, 1024, F32, 48) (dual of [1024, 932, 49]-code), using an extension Ce(47) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,47], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 48 [i]
- linear OA(3276, 1024, F32, 40) (dual of [1024, 948, 41]-code), using an extension Ce(39) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,39], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 40 [i]
- linear OA(327, 23, F32, 7) (dual of [23, 16, 8]-code or 23-arc in PG(6,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(327, 32, F32, 7) (dual of [32, 25, 8]-code or 32-arc in PG(6,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(25,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(327, 32, F32, 7) (dual of [32, 25, 8]-code or 32-arc in PG(6,32)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(47) ⊂ Ce(39) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3299, 1047, F32, 48) (dual of [1047, 948, 49]-code), using
(51, 51+48, 511368)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 99, 511369)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 102294 122975 989332 869379 197393 455603 977939 202193 459209 381309 539945 277746 676215 402504 219507 868444 199065 639870 313809 619328 383241 873754 335358 003189 912664 > 3299 [i]