MinT - Best Known (71−51, 71, s)-Nets in Base 32

Best Known (71−51, 71, s)-Nets in Base 32

(71−51, 71, 120)-Net over F₃₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (20, 71, 120)-net over F₃₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 71, 120)-net over F₃₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F₃₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
    - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(71−51, 71, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive

(20, 71, 177)-net in base 32, using

7 times m-reduction [i] based on (20, 78, 177)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 65, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
      - a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(71−51, 71, 177)-Net over F₃₂ — Digital

Digital (20, 71, 177)-net over F₃₂, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 176)-sequence over F₃₂, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
  - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(71−51, 71, 5365)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s

There is no (20, 71, 5366)-net in base 32, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 70, 5366)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32^mÂ â‰¥ 2293 670846 537178 393346 179382 906956 147660 593269 062617 202792 911316 009280 651831 445829 306858 452055 681713 020836 > 32⁷⁰ [i]