Best Known (110−53, 110, s)-Nets in Base 32
(110−53, 110, 240)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (57, 110, 240)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (51, 110, 240)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 40, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 70, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (11, 40, 120)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(110−53, 110, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(57, 110, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 322 times duplication [i] based on (55, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
(110−53, 110, 1032)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (57, 110, 1032)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(32110, 1032, F32, 53) (dual of [1032, 922, 54]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(32110, 1042, F32, 53) (dual of [1042, 932, 54]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,26]) ⊂ C([0,23]) [i] based on
- linear OA(32105, 1025, F32, 53) (dual of [1025, 920, 54]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1025 | 324−1, defining interval I = [0,26], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−26,−25,…,26}|+1 = 54 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(3293, 1025, F32, 47) (dual of [1025, 932, 48]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1025 | 324−1, defining interval I = [0,23], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−23,−22,…,23}|+1 = 48 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(325, 17, F32, 5) (dual of [17, 12, 6]-code or 17-arc in PG(4,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(325, 32, F32, 5) (dual of [32, 27, 6]-code or 32-arc in PG(4,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(27,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(325, 32, F32, 5) (dual of [32, 27, 6]-code or 32-arc in PG(4,32)), using
- construction X applied to C([0,26]) ⊂ C([0,23]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(32110, 1042, F32, 53) (dual of [1042, 932, 54]-code), using
(110−53, 110, 694984)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (57, 110, 694985)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (57, 109, 694985)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 115 176251 592032 619318 154769 965037 252916 232300 824184 870172 553272 354038 236972 965222 688935 061803 141542 764765 680418 031745 460411 380372 506376 185640 922786 435011 952215 768416 > 32109 [i]