Best Known (19, 19+59, s)-Nets in Base 32
(19, 19+59, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (19, 78, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 78, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(19, 19+59, 128)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(19, 78, 128)-net in base 32, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (19, 84, 128)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 70, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 70, 128)-net over F64, using
(19, 19+59, 172)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (19, 78, 172)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 171)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
(19, 19+59, 3719)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (19, 78, 3720)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (19, 77, 3720)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 79 271404 395057 531855 668931 581094 773564 470924 805891 228848 107219 919862 612462 284107 640141 141140 814866 816846 923505 762640 > 3277 [i]