MinT - Best Known (91−65, 91, s)-Nets in Base 32

Best Known (91−65, 91, s)-Nets in Base 32

(91−65, 91, 120)-Net over F₃₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (26, 91, 120)-net over F₃₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 91, 120)-net over F₃₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F₃₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
    - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(91−65, 91, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive

(26, 91, 177)-net in base 32, using

t-expansion [i] based on (25, 91, 177)-net in base 32, using
- 17 times m-reduction [i] based on (25, 108, 177)-net in base 32, using
  - base change [i] based on digital (7, 90, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(91−65, 91, 225)-Net over F₃₂ — Digital

Digital (26, 91, 225)-net over F₃₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 91, 225)-net over F₃₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 224)-sequence over F₃₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(91−65, 91, 7042)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s

There is no (26, 91, 7043)-net in base 32, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 90, 7043)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32^mÂ â‰¥ 2912 162707 433039 885835 616308 593036 744071 421697 582286 120792 827410 519051 152610 349725 659774 207255 556352 441742 991943 905529 576210 950875 003140 > 32⁹⁰ [i]