Best Known (21, 21+65, s)-Nets in Base 32
(21, 21+65, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (21, 86, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 86, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(21, 21+65, 128)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(21, 86, 128)-net in base 32, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 96, 128)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 80, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 80, 128)-net over F64, using
(21, 21+65, 185)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (21, 86, 185)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 185, using
(21, 21+65, 4090)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (21, 86, 4091)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (21, 85, 4091)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 86 685253 857168 948644 295960 966402 352437 833031 948985 174534 894340 522046 920895 062714 629095 626264 571057 089020 145194 560230 132000 863545 > 3285 [i]