Best Known (33, 33+65, s)-Nets in Base 32
(33, 33+65, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 98, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 98, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(33, 33+65, 216)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(33, 98, 216)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 70, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
(33, 33+65, 273)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (33, 98, 273)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (30, 98, 273)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (30, 272)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 273, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (30, 272)-sequence over F32, using
(33, 33+65, 15049)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 98, 15050)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 97, 15050)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 99 959625 438523 707798 928085 315856 431692 365905 857887 530362 322350 801187 596041 286296 188159 946114 897522 793529 966572 943281 315795 460743 867834 314521 446378 > 3297 [i]