Best Known (99−66, 99, s)-Nets in Base 32
(99−66, 99, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 99, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 99, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(99−66, 99, 192)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(33, 99, 192)-net in base 32, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (33, 105, 192)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 75, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 75, 192)-net over F128, using
(99−66, 99, 273)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (33, 99, 273)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (30, 99, 273)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (30, 272)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 273, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (30, 272)-sequence over F32, using
(99−66, 99, 13896)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 99, 13897)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 102383 028939 483053 786566 027069 089457 850853 326071 048400 104291 818586 195336 981484 065857 375071 057673 088848 147305 318821 330280 728229 029300 393509 062083 272720 > 3299 [i]