MinT - Best Known (100−67, 100, s)-Nets in Base 32

Best Known (100−67, 100, s)-Nets in Base 32

(100−67, 100, 120)-Net over F₃₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (33, 100, 120)-net over F₃₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 100, 120)-net over F₃₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F₃₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
    - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(100−67, 100, 192)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive

(33, 100, 192)-net in base 32, using

5 times m-reduction [i] based on (33, 105, 192)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 75, 192)-net over F₁₂₈, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F₁₂₈, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₂₈ with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(100−67, 100, 273)-Net over F₃₂ — Digital

Digital (33, 100, 273)-net over F₃₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (30, 100, 273)-net over F₃₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (30, 272)-sequence over F₃₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 273, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(100−67, 100, 13896)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s

There is no (33, 100, 13897)-net in base 32, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 99, 13897)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32^mÂ â‰¥ 102383 028939 483053 786566 027069 089457 850853 326071 048400 104291 818586 195336 981484 065857 375071 057673 088848 147305 318821 330280 728229 029300 393509 062083 272720 > 32⁹⁹ [i]