Best Known (22, 101, s)-Nets in Base 32
(22, 101, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 101, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 101, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(22, 101, 128)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(22, 101, 128)-net in base 32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 102, 128)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 85, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 85, 128)-net over F64, using
(22, 101, 185)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (22, 101, 185)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 101, 185)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 185, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
(22, 101, 3572)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 101, 3573)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (22, 100, 3573)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 3 291952 794417 073486 152394 157658 100047 775510 013322 502953 121779 391203 475821 142583 957857 014776 904614 311297 815376 136588 949703 163655 654080 518617 913551 666736 > 32100 [i]