Best Known (55, 107, s)-Nets in Base 32
(55, 107, 240)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (55, 107, 240)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (51, 107, 240)-net over F32, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 109, 240)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 40, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 69, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (11, 40, 120)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 109, 240)-net over F32, using
(55, 107, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(55, 107, 513)-net in base 32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (46, 107, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
(55, 107, 952)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (55, 107, 952)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(32107, 952, F32, 52) (dual of [952, 845, 53]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(32107, 1047, F32, 52) (dual of [1047, 940, 53]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(51) ⊂ Ce(43) [i] based on
- linear OA(32100, 1024, F32, 52) (dual of [1024, 924, 53]-code), using an extension Ce(51) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,51], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 52 [i]
- linear OA(3284, 1024, F32, 44) (dual of [1024, 940, 45]-code), using an extension Ce(43) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,43], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 44 [i]
- linear OA(327, 23, F32, 7) (dual of [23, 16, 8]-code or 23-arc in PG(6,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(327, 32, F32, 7) (dual of [32, 25, 8]-code or 32-arc in PG(6,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(25,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(327, 32, F32, 7) (dual of [32, 25, 8]-code or 32-arc in PG(6,32)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(51) ⊂ Ce(43) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(32107, 1047, F32, 52) (dual of [1047, 940, 53]-code), using
(55, 107, 532342)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (55, 107, 532343)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 112472 974075 459706 636040 226287 724079 063372 976961 920158 079684 478536 244111 065676 965963 052352 090986 875411 969366 898586 330279 632625 367029 791135 919984 582054 078748 221140 > 32107 [i]