Best Known (8, 15, s)-Nets in Base 32
(8, 15, 344)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (8, 15, 344)-net over F32, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(3215, 344, F32, 7, 7) (dual of [(344, 7), 2393, 8]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 3-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(3215, 1033, F32, 7) (dual of [1033, 1018, 8]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([1020,2]), C2 = C([0,3]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,2]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([1020,3]) [i] based on
- linear OA(3211, 1023, F32, 6) (dual of [1023, 1012, 7]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = {−3,−2,…,2}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 7 [i]
- linear OA(327, 1023, F32, 4) (dual of [1023, 1016, 5]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [0,3], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 5 [i]
- linear OA(3213, 1023, F32, 7) (dual of [1023, 1010, 8]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = {−3,−2,…,3}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 8 [i]
- linear OA(325, 1023, F32, 3) (dual of [1023, 1018, 4]-code or 1023-cap in PG(4,32)), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [0,2], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 4 [i]
- linear OA(322, 8, F32, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(322, 32, F32, 2) (dual of [32, 30, 3]-code or 32-arc in PG(1,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(30,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(322, 32, F32, 2) (dual of [32, 30, 3]-code or 32-arc in PG(1,32)), using
- linear OA(320, 2, F32, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(320, s, F32, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([1020,2]), C2 = C([0,3]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,2]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([1020,3]) [i] based on
- OOA 3-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(3215, 1033, F32, 7) (dual of [1033, 1018, 8]-code), using
(8, 15, 1051)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (8, 15, 1051)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3215, 1051, F32, 7) (dual of [1051, 1036, 8]-code), using
- 22 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 21 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(3213, 1027, F32, 7) (dual of [1027, 1014, 8]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([1022,4]), C2 = C([0,5]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,4]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([1022,5]) [i] based on
- linear OA(3211, 1023, F32, 6) (dual of [1023, 1012, 7]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,4}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 7 [i]
- linear OA(3211, 1023, F32, 6) (dual of [1023, 1012, 7]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [0,5], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 7 [i]
- linear OA(3213, 1023, F32, 7) (dual of [1023, 1010, 8]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,5}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 8 [i]
- linear OA(329, 1023, F32, 5) (dual of [1023, 1014, 6]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [0,4], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 6 [i]
- linear OA(320, 2, F32, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(320, s, F32, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(320, 2, F32, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code) (see above)
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([1022,4]), C2 = C([0,5]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,4]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([1022,5]) [i] based on
- 22 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 21 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(3213, 1027, F32, 7) (dual of [1027, 1014, 8]-code), using
(8, 15, 619518)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (8, 15, 619519)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (8, 14, 619519)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 1180 592523 331649 500068 > 3214 [i]