Best Known (4, 21, s)-Nets in Base 32
(4, 21, 64)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (4, 21, 64)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (3, 21, 64)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
(4, 21, 65)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(4, 21, 65)-net in base 32, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 24, 65)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 20, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 20, 65)-net over F64, using
(4, 21, 71)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (4, 21, 71)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 70)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 71, using
(4, 21, 699)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (4, 21, 700)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (4, 20, 700)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 1 272726 738643 392763 044662 399191 > 3220 [i]