Best Known (13, 36, s)-Nets in Base 32
(13, 36, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (13, 36, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 36, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(13, 36, 129)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (13, 36, 129)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (12, 36, 129)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 128)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 128)-sequence over F32, using
(13, 36, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(13, 36, 177)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 30, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(13, 36, 9739)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (13, 36, 9740)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (13, 35, 9740)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 47928 826531 940206 918711 379601 085946 070473 464547 260223 > 3235 [i]