MinT - Best Known (16, 43, s)-Nets in Base 32

Best Known (16, 43, s)-Nets in Base 32

(16, 43, 120)-Net over F₃₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (16, 43, 120)-net over F₃₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 43, 120)-net over F₃₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F₃₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
    - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(16, 43, 158)-Net over F₃₂ — Digital

Digital (16, 43, 158)-net over F₃₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (15, 43, 158)-net over F₃₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 157)-sequence over F₃₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 158, using
    - an algebraic function field by Beelen and Pellikaan [i]

(16, 43, 192)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive

(16, 43, 192)-net in base 32, using

32¹ times duplication [i] based on (15, 42, 192)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 30, 192)-net over F₁₂₈, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F₁₂₈, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₂₈ with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(16, 43, 13323)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s

There is no (16, 43, 13324)-net in base 32, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (16, 42, 13324)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32^mÂ â‰¥ 1645 852657 126487 649974 561261 895076 317297 252345 401793 357681 685248 > 32⁴² [i]