Best Known (18, 43, s)-Nets in Base 32
(18, 43, 128)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (18, 43, 128)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 15, 64)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (3, 28, 64)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (3, 15, 64)-net over F32, using
(18, 43, 162)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (18, 43, 162)-net over F32, using
(18, 43, 258)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(18, 43, 258)-net in base 32, using
- 321 times duplication [i] based on (17, 42, 258)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on (10, 35, 258)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 36, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 27, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 27, 258)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 36, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on (10, 35, 258)-net in base 64, using
(18, 43, 289)-Net in Base 32
(18, 43, 289)-net in base 32, using
- 321 times duplication [i] based on (17, 42, 289)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on (10, 35, 289)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 36, 289)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 27, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 27, 289)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 36, 289)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on (10, 35, 289)-net in base 64, using
(18, 43, 31618)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (18, 43, 31619)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (18, 42, 31619)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 1645 701724 021333 659303 989905 900842 203035 208818 465789 922489 788576 > 3242 [i]