Best Known (30, 57, s)-Nets in Base 32
(30, 57, 202)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 57, 202)-net over F32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 58, 202)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 21, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (9, 37, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (7, 21, 98)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(30, 57, 288)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(30, 57, 288)-net in base 32, using
- 15 times m-reduction [i] based on (30, 72, 288)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on (18, 60, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 63, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 54, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 54, 288)-net over F128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 63, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on (18, 60, 288)-net in base 64, using
(30, 57, 761)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (30, 57, 761)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3257, 761, F32, 27) (dual of [761, 704, 28]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3257, 1038, F32, 27) (dual of [1038, 981, 28]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(26) ⊂ Ce(21) [i] based on
- linear OA(3253, 1024, F32, 27) (dual of [1024, 971, 28]-code), using an extension Ce(26) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,26], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 27 [i]
- linear OA(3243, 1024, F32, 22) (dual of [1024, 981, 23]-code), using an extension Ce(21) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,21], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- linear OA(324, 14, F32, 4) (dual of [14, 10, 5]-code or 14-arc in PG(3,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(324, 32, F32, 4) (dual of [32, 28, 5]-code or 32-arc in PG(3,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(28,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(324, 32, F32, 4) (dual of [32, 28, 5]-code or 32-arc in PG(3,32)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(26) ⊂ Ce(21) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3257, 1038, F32, 27) (dual of [1038, 981, 28]-code), using
(30, 57, 556881)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 57, 556882)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 56, 556882)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 1 942710 692703 917167 073235 181742 928679 671315 258045 536871 748806 752338 853767 084567 131940 > 3256 [i]