Best Known (18, 59, s)-Nets in Base 32
(18, 59, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (18, 59, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 59, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(18, 59, 161)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (18, 59, 161)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 160)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 161, using
(18, 59, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(18, 59, 177)-net in base 32, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 66, 177)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 55, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 55, 177)-net over F64, using
(18, 59, 6196)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (18, 59, 6197)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (18, 58, 6197)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 1990 408083 219663 200347 737901 665397 401354 879037 092286 189901 738870 094112 510435 705669 555831 > 3258 [i]