Best Known (27, 64, s)-Nets in Base 32
(27, 64, 142)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 64, 142)-net over F32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (27, 65, 142)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 20, 44)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 43)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 44, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 43)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (7, 45, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (1, 20, 44)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(27, 64, 226)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (27, 64, 226)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(3264, 226, F32, 2, 37) (dual of [(226, 2), 388, 38]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(3264, 227, F32, 2, 37) (dual of [(227, 2), 390, 38]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(2;F,410P) ⊂ AG(2;F,414P) [i] based on
- linear OOA(3261, 224, F32, 2, 37) (dual of [(224, 2), 387, 38]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,410P) [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- linear OOA(3257, 224, F32, 2, 33) (dual of [(224, 2), 391, 34]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,414P) [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 225 (see above)
- linear OOA(323, 3, F32, 2, 3) (dual of [(3, 2), 3, 4]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(323, 32, F32, 2, 3) (dual of [(32, 2), 61, 4]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;61,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(323, 32, F32, 2, 3) (dual of [(32, 2), 61, 4]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(2;F,410P) ⊂ AG(2;F,414P) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(3264, 227, F32, 2, 37) (dual of [(227, 2), 390, 38]-NRT-code), using
(27, 64, 260)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(27, 64, 260)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 40, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
(27, 64, 321)-Net in Base 32
(27, 64, 321)-net in base 32, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (27, 66, 321)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on (16, 55, 321)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 56, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 42, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 42, 321)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 56, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on (16, 55, 321)-net in base 64, using
(27, 64, 45155)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 64, 45156)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 63, 45156)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 66775 879716 329254 050197 267090 845396 785497 539791 778729 704009 048854 878468 100266 293739 257461 280950 > 3263 [i]