Best Known (36, 80, s)-Nets in Base 32
(36, 80, 196)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 80, 196)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 29, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (7, 51, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (7, 29, 98)-net over F32, using
(36, 80, 288)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(36, 80, 288)-net in base 32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (35, 80, 288)-net in base 32, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on (35, 91, 288)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 65, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 65, 288)-net over F128, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on (35, 91, 288)-net in base 32, using
(36, 80, 344)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (36, 80, 344)-net over F32, using
(36, 80, 86837)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 80, 86838)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 582496 806398 851082 747207 677362 954203 213267 234837 780836 748044 904882 039189 092009 429515 334932 417388 327847 106465 260910 016912 > 3280 [i]