Best Known (48, 80, s)-Nets in Base 32
(48, 80, 294)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 80, 294)-net over F32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (48, 81, 294)-net over F32, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 18, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (7, 23, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (7, 40, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (7, 18, 98)-net over F32, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(48, 80, 516)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(48, 80, 516)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (18, 50, 516)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 17, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- digital (1, 17, 258)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(48, 80, 3084)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (48, 80, 3084)-net over F32, using
(48, 80, 7360824)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 80, 7360825)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 582253 997129 278605 162378 491791 031714 092585 665241 048957 371765 804931 419877 281637 904512 134730 052962 020047 951652 238694 433561 > 3280 [i]