Best Known (54, 81, s)-Nets in Base 32
(54, 81, 2521)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 81, 2521)-net over F32, using
- 321 times duplication [i] based on digital (53, 80, 2521)-net over F32, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(3280, 2521, F32, 27, 27) (dual of [(2521, 27), 67987, 28]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 13-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(3280, 32774, F32, 27) (dual of [32774, 32694, 28]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3280, 32776, F32, 27) (dual of [32776, 32696, 28]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,13]) ⊂ C([0,12]) [i] based on
- linear OA(3279, 32769, F32, 27) (dual of [32769, 32690, 28]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 32769 | 326−1, defining interval I = [0,13], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−13,−12,…,13}|+1 = 28 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(3273, 32769, F32, 25) (dual of [32769, 32696, 26]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 32769 | 326−1, defining interval I = [0,12], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−12,−11,…,12}|+1 = 26 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(321, 7, F32, 1) (dual of [7, 6, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(321, s, F32, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to C([0,13]) ⊂ C([0,12]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3280, 32776, F32, 27) (dual of [32776, 32696, 28]-code), using
- OOA 13-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(3280, 32774, F32, 27) (dual of [32774, 32694, 28]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(3280, 2521, F32, 27, 27) (dual of [(2521, 27), 67987, 28]-NRT-code), using
(54, 81, 21503)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (54, 81, 21503)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3281, 21503, F32, 27) (dual of [21503, 21422, 28]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3281, 32779, F32, 27) (dual of [32779, 32698, 28]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(26) ⊂ Ce(23) [i] based on
- linear OA(3279, 32768, F32, 27) (dual of [32768, 32689, 28]-code), using an extension Ce(26) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 32767 = 323−1, defining interval I = [1,26], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 27 [i]
- linear OA(3270, 32768, F32, 24) (dual of [32768, 32698, 25]-code), using an extension Ce(23) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 32767 = 323−1, defining interval I = [1,23], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- linear OA(322, 11, F32, 2) (dual of [11, 9, 3]-code or 11-arc in PG(1,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(322, 32, F32, 2) (dual of [32, 30, 3]-code or 32-arc in PG(1,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(30,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(322, 32, F32, 2) (dual of [32, 30, 3]-code or 32-arc in PG(1,32)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(26) ⊂ Ce(23) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3281, 32779, F32, 27) (dual of [32779, 32698, 28]-code), using
(54, 81, large)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 81, large)-net in base 32, because
- 25 times m-reduction [i] would yield (54, 56, large)-net in base 32, but