Best Known (36, 85, s)-Nets in Base 32
(36, 85, 174)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 85, 174)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 29, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (7, 56, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (5, 29, 76)-net over F32, using
(36, 85, 278)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (36, 85, 278)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(3285, 278, F32, 2, 49) (dual of [(278, 2), 471, 50]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(2;F,494P) ⊂ AG(2;F,501P) [i] based on
- linear OOA(3279, 272, F32, 2, 49) (dual of [(272, 2), 465, 50]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,494P) [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 273, using
- linear OOA(3272, 272, F32, 2, 42) (dual of [(272, 2), 472, 43]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,501P) [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 273 (see above)
- linear OOA(326, 6, F32, 2, 6) (dual of [(6, 2), 6, 7]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(326, 32, F32, 2, 6) (dual of [(32, 2), 58, 7]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;58,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(326, 32, F32, 2, 6) (dual of [(32, 2), 58, 7]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(2;F,494P) ⊂ AG(2;F,501P) [i] based on
(36, 85, 288)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(36, 85, 288)-net in base 32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (35, 85, 288)-net in base 32, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (35, 91, 288)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 65, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 65, 288)-net over F128, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (35, 91, 288)-net in base 32, using
(36, 85, 342)-Net in Base 32
(36, 85, 342)-net in base 32, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on (36, 96, 342)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (20, 80, 342)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 342, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (20, 80, 342)-net over F64, using
(36, 85, 58605)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 85, 58606)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 84, 58606)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 708741 454089 461266 245371 382031 531583 581425 370132 585111 904017 502479 081637 217454 331103 775236 802443 182891 897853 198337 749158 668938 > 3284 [i]