Best Known (22, 88, s)-Nets in Base 32
(22, 88, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 88, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 88, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(22, 88, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(22, 88, 177)-net in base 32, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 90, 177)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 75, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 75, 177)-net over F64, using
(22, 88, 185)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (22, 88, 185)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 88, 185)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 185, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
(22, 88, 4365)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 88, 4366)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 850183 323719 989473 568148 353280 904985 030384 721782 331842 926589 346789 632218 286693 282070 804483 314269 199122 476608 541075 640992 202256 265480 > 3288 [i]