Best Known (23, 91, s)-Nets in Base 32
(23, 91, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 91, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 91, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(23, 91, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(23, 91, 177)-net in base 32, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (23, 96, 177)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 80, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 80, 177)-net over F64, using
(23, 91, 185)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (23, 91, 185)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 91, 185)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 185, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
(23, 91, 4644)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 91, 4645)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 93204 062720 886564 299466 178730 581430 929219 554089 232415 540830 343612 085909 871902 503178 724743 856109 229825 416440 263425 723113 383933 488326 007830 > 3291 [i]