Best Known (24, 91, s)-Nets in Base 32
(24, 91, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 91, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 91, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(24, 91, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(24, 91, 177)-net in base 32, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on (24, 102, 177)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 85, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 85, 177)-net over F64, using
(24, 91, 225)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (24, 91, 225)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 224)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
(24, 91, 5389)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 91, 5390)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 90, 5390)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2910 385958 357200 247094 350225 264961 210743 161530 598555 187378 327524 285160 108241 855019 240176 649955 709205 616911 980812 314448 401369 372166 981928 > 3290 [i]