Best Known (25, 91, s)-Nets in Base 32
(25, 91, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 91, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 91, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(25, 91, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(25, 91, 177)-net in base 32, using
- 17 times m-reduction [i] based on (25, 108, 177)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 90, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 90, 177)-net over F64, using
(25, 91, 225)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (25, 91, 225)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 91, 225)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 224)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 224)-sequence over F32, using
(25, 91, 5988)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 91, 5989)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 93259 910716 320533 289706 845329 696742 367009 340600 754785 909198 655313 944243 634917 185874 963160 820459 046074 174193 582829 166838 731160 598195 736612 > 3291 [i]