Best Known (48, 92, s)-Nets in Base 32
(48, 92, 240)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 92, 240)-net over F32, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (48, 100, 240)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 37, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 63, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (11, 37, 120)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(48, 92, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(48, 92, 513)-net in base 32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (46, 92, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 90, 513)-net over F64, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 108, 513)-net in base 32, using
(48, 92, 952)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (48, 92, 952)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3292, 952, F32, 44) (dual of [952, 860, 45]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3292, 1050, F32, 44) (dual of [1050, 958, 45]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(43) ⊂ Ce(34) [i] based on
- linear OA(3284, 1024, F32, 44) (dual of [1024, 940, 45]-code), using an extension Ce(43) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,43], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 44 [i]
- linear OA(3266, 1024, F32, 35) (dual of [1024, 958, 36]-code), using an extension Ce(34) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,34], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 35 [i]
- linear OA(328, 26, F32, 8) (dual of [26, 18, 9]-code or 26-arc in PG(7,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(328, 32, F32, 8) (dual of [32, 24, 9]-code or 32-arc in PG(7,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(24,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(328, 32, F32, 8) (dual of [32, 24, 9]-code or 32-arc in PG(7,32)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(43) ⊂ Ce(34) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3292, 1050, F32, 44) (dual of [1050, 958, 45]-code), using
(48, 92, 575104)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 92, 575105)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 977241 441482 558094 820392 482258 212708 588178 765857 202265 509356 577570 494147 920921 849896 934035 299690 321935 382162 275651 143927 912879 831854 098496 > 3292 [i]