Best Known (30, 93, s)-Nets in Base 32
(30, 93, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 93, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 93, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(30, 93, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(30, 93, 177)-net in base 32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (25, 93, 177)-net in base 32, using
- 15 times m-reduction [i] based on (25, 108, 177)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 90, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 90, 177)-net over F64, using
- 15 times m-reduction [i] based on (25, 108, 177)-net in base 32, using
(30, 93, 273)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (30, 93, 273)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (30, 272)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 273, using
(30, 93, 11721)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 93, 11722)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 92, 11722)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 982651 967179 612580 775719 659280 648770 170605 689838 061372 365993 757731 255398 436891 435430 760170 166775 381399 644949 300480 847415 479925 064742 141280 > 3292 [i]