Best Known (22, 98, s)-Nets in Base 32
(22, 98, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 98, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 98, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(22, 98, 128)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(22, 98, 128)-net in base 32, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 102, 128)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 85, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 85, 128)-net over F64, using
(22, 98, 185)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (22, 98, 185)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 98, 185)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 185, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
(22, 98, 3671)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 98, 3672)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 3219 893175 379446 876662 088052 632031 521365 122168 055199 522208 850121 049470 036342 652373 227956 638134 689001 358275 903645 069862 875920 662590 763818 358416 123670 > 3298 [i]