MinT - Best Known (27, 98, s)-Nets in Base 32

Best Known (27, 98, s)-Nets in Base 32

(27, 98, 120)-Net over F₃₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (27, 98, 120)-net over F₃₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 98, 120)-net over F₃₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F₃₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
    - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(27, 98, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive

(27, 98, 177)-net in base 32, using

t-expansion [i] based on (25, 98, 177)-net in base 32, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on (25, 108, 177)-net in base 32, using
  - base change [i] based on digital (7, 90, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(27, 98, 225)-Net over F₃₂ — Digital

Digital (27, 98, 225)-net over F₃₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 98, 225)-net over F₃₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 224)-sequence over F₃₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(27, 98, 6639)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s

There is no (27, 98, 6640)-net in base 32, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 97, 6640)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32^mÂ â‰¥ 100 168143 669510 401059 897105 874143 137386 564509 933540 612518 744233 671032 026931 684984 555910 884137 325418 691500 259413 553729 755999 661738 297476 180766 658391 > 32⁹⁷ [i]