Best Known (142, 142+101, s)-Nets in Base 4
(142, 142+101, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (142, 243, 137)-net over F4, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (142, 250, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 69, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 181, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 69, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(142, 142+101, 307)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (142, 243, 307)-net over F4, using
(142, 142+101, 5286)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (142, 243, 5287)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (142, 242, 5287)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 50 278683 024971 080281 535688 127911 922117 471912 954871 118086 318946 197505 514458 916685 635626 757545 705488 384572 447663 509027 686958 973199 487157 217849 443640 > 4242 [i]