Best Known (248−105, 248, s)-Nets in Base 4
(248−105, 248, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 248, 137)-net over F4, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (143, 253, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 70, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 183, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 70, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(248−105, 248, 294)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (143, 248, 294)-net over F4, using
(248−105, 248, 4838)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 248, 4839)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (143, 247, 4839)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 51204 499272 312509 807212 507105 857926 652298 353499 684799 201936 354463 635800 176137 419025 243294 794019 693202 819096 134903 690375 584961 493744 887151 583403 994700 > 4247 [i]