Best Known (249−105, 249, s)-Nets in Base 4
(249−105, 249, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (144, 249, 137)-net over F4, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (144, 256, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 71, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 185, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 71, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(249−105, 249, 299)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (144, 249, 299)-net over F4, using
(249−105, 249, 4970)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (144, 249, 4971)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (144, 248, 4971)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 205051 797854 302976 647748 061544 108205 955841 978298 305813 210370 660882 797908 635862 011881 811642 482855 648972 155059 174638 742021 498840 071274 049373 022746 525240 > 4248 [i]