Best Known (256−107, 256, s)-Nets in Base 4
(256−107, 256, 138)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (149, 256, 138)-net over F4, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (149, 259, 138)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 76, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 183, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (21, 76, 34)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(256−107, 256, 316)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (149, 256, 316)-net over F4, using
(256−107, 256, 5368)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (149, 256, 5369)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (149, 255, 5369)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 3363 021020 279025 770390 016110 772520 400720 951412 011439 901919 920549 921361 972672 164404 644140 181586 733128 310285 960339 756723 377563 285323 730412 104803 120772 831392 > 4255 [i]