Best Known (256−109, 256, s)-Nets in Base 4
(256−109, 256, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (147, 256, 137)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (145, 256, 137)-net over F4, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (145, 259, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 187, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (145, 259, 137)-net over F4, using
(256−109, 256, 297)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (147, 256, 297)-net over F4, using
(256−109, 256, 4825)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (147, 256, 4826)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (147, 255, 4826)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 3384 200835 787459 916116 383928 965881 746487 760617 854362 933034 431462 117839 003914 765198 152868 220083 234889 483360 948569 236752 160061 427507 170643 224489 771587 536200 > 4255 [i]