Best Known (145, 145+109, s)-Nets in Base 4
(145, 145+109, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 254, 137)-net over F4, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (145, 259, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 187, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(145, 145+109, 288)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (145, 254, 288)-net over F4, using
(145, 145+109, 4581)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 254, 4582)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (145, 253, 4582)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 210 883538 862597 297296 633190 007449 159516 279618 054415 783606 300742 247219 379612 874183 666088 964057 222732 907740 203144 356394 331993 286330 551555 157899 606526 494720 > 4253 [i]